Subject	Poor RT was all stock, if I remember correctly (n/m)
Posted by	Dean on November 20, 2000 at 10:31 PM
	This message has been viewed 11 times.
In Reply To	TT is hella more expensive to maintain posted by AntiHero[Z-Less] on November 20, 2000 at 10:12 PM
Message
Follow Ups	tt vs na >>> - carman 21:30:17 11/20/00 its not the same though heh. You pay for the extra power =p (n/m) - Illusionz (Custom Sub Boxes) 21:31:38 11/20/00 It's not the same, TT maintenance is generally more - KILLR300ZX 21:33:48 11/20/00 i need something to say that will help me get a tt - carman 21:37:45 11/20/00 there is nothing to say. It flat costs more, it is faster - toyluvr 21:39:28 11/20/00 If you're trying to please mommy and daddy - KILLR300ZX 21:41:38 11/20/00 but there is a real nice tt local to him - Ric (Halo Z) 21:52:34 11/20/00 in a perfect world. (n/m) - Ric (Halo Z) 21:49:08 11/20/00 hard to compare... - Bruce_Zee[MD] 21:41:31 11/20/00 I've had both ---> - Arthur 21:45:52 11/20/00 Hey Arthur, where have you been? Haven't seen a post from>> - Zster 22:34:37 11/20/00 New job, long hours, not as much time... :( - Arthur 00:03:35 11/21/00 I agree totally with Arthur from 92TT & 93NA, - Sweep 10:33:17 11/21/00 A word of advice, for start on an NA, it is more car than>> - Zster 21:54:36 11/20/00 agreed! A 240sx 5spd might be a good starter (n/m) - toyluvr 22:04:20 11/20/00 no way man 8) - craZy 23:32:26 11/20/00 TT is hella more expensive to maintain - AntiHero[Z-Less] 22:12:08 11/20/00 Poor RT was all stock, if I remember correctly (n/m) - Dean 22:31:46 11/20/00 Incorrect... - lL (Pittsburgh) 22:44:06 11/20/00 lucky you.. i bet it does just depend on previous condition - AntiHero[Z-Less] 23:14:21 11/20/00 Re: lucky you.. i bet it does just depend on previous condit - lL (Pittsburgh) 23:30:20 11/20/00 facts are facts-----> - TRUOMEGA 22:26:46 11/20/00 I hate to say this - ym 22:59:27 11/20/00
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.